Writing Task 2 Examples

The topic of capital punishment has been a contentious issue for decades, with opinions divided on its necessity and effectiveness. Some argue that without the death penalty, society becomes more vulnerable and violent crimes increase. They believe that capital punishment is crucial for maintaining order and deterring serious crimes. This essay will argue against this viewpoint, highlighting why the death penalty is not essential for societal security.
Proponents of capital punishment assert that it serves as a powerful deterrent against violent crimes. They claim that the fear of execution prevents individuals from committing serious offences. For instance, countries with strict enforcement of the death penalty, like Saudi Arabia, often cite low crime rates as evidence of its effectiveness. These supporters believe that the death penalty is necessary to ensure public safety and justice for victims.
However, substantial research contradicts the deterrent effect of capital punishment. Studies comparing crime rates in regions with and without the death penalty show no significant difference in violent crime rates. For example, in the United States, states that have abolished the death penalty, such as New York, have not experienced an increase in homicide rates compared to states that retain it. Moreover, the possibility of wrongful execution poses a severe ethical dilemma, as innocent lives may be unjustly taken, thus undermining the moral foundation of the justice system.
In conclusion, the death penalty does not significantly deter crime, and the risk of executing innocent individuals raises profound ethical concerns. Therefore, it is recommended that societies invest in more effective crime prevention strategies, such as improved law enforcement, rehabilitation programmes, and addressing the root causes of crime.