Writing Task 2 Examples

The use of living animals in scientific research has long been a topic of ethical debate. While some find it fascinating due to the potential for medical advancements, others view it as an inherently cruel practice. This essay will discuss both perspectives, ultimately arguing that the cruelty inflicted on animals outweighs the benefits and alternative methods should be pursued.

Firstly, it is essential to acknowledge the significant contributions that animal research has made to medical science. Many life-saving treatments and vaccines have been developed through studies involving animals. For instance, the polio vaccine, which has eradicated the disease in many parts of the world, was developed through research conducted on monkeys. Such advancements highlight the potential benefits of animal research, making it a compelling argument for those who see it as interesting and necessary.

However, the ethical implications of using animals in research cannot be ignored. Animals used in experiments often endure significant suffering, including pain, confinement, and distress. For example, rodents used in toxicology tests are frequently exposed to harmful substances, leading to severe health issues and death. The cruelty inherent in these practices raises serious ethical concerns, prompting a growing number of people to oppose animal testing. They argue that inflicting such suffering on sentient beings for human benefit is morally unacceptable.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that the cruelty inflicted on animals in the name of research is unjustifiable. Moving forward, it is imperative to invest in and develop alternative methods, such as in vitro testing and computer modeling, which can provide reliable results without harming animals